Premises Liability Extends to Golf Courses as Well

-- End Ad Box --->making a decision have to do with charges that
Who would think that premises liability wouldthe defendant didn’t adequately train their
extend to a golf course? It does and courseemployees on proper golf cart operation, failed to
owners and employees need to be aware.warn the man of the dangers of standing in the
Let’s consider a case that we heard aboutback of the golf cart, and that the employee
just recently about a man who wound up withoverloaded the cart, thus causing it to be unstable.
traumatic brain injury after falling off a golf cart.The underlying premises here is that property
The man’s wife is seeking damages forowners may be held liable for personal injuries
the trauma and loss of consortium in the form ofsustained by an injured party if there was a
a personal injury lawsuit.dangerous/hazardous condition on the property
The story goes like this: the gentleman wasthat could/should have been fixed. In fact, that
golfing when one of the club’s employeesdangerous condition should not even have been
offered to give him a ride in one of thethere in the first place. However, the fact that it
club’s golf carts. Evidently rather than beingwas, increases the level of responsibility the
able to sit on the front seat with the employee,defendant has to those who use the
he was told to stand in the area normallydefendant’s property, in this case the golf
reserved for carrying the golf clubs. Thecourse and its carts. Because the employee
foundation of this personal injury lawsuit is therepresents the property owner, they have a duty
negligence of the employee who was driving theof care toward people using the property.
golf cart at the time of the accident.Falls have the potential to cause extremely
Other pertinent facts in the case were revealed inserious injuries that include traumatic brain injury
the court documents and dealt with the allegations(such as this case), broken hips, dislocations, and
that the employee drove the cart with excessivespinal cord injuries. These aren’t exactly
speed for the conditions of the terrain and madeeasy injuries to treat, and many of them are
an exceedingly sharp turn with no warning, causinglong-term, painful and costly to treat. Many of
the woman’s husband to be thrown fromthese injuries also have the potential to be
the cart.permanent.
The man was taken to hospital for treatment andIf you’ve been hurt in an accident similar
the doctor treating him informed the court thatto this or at a different location, don’t
the man is in a coma. His chances of recoveringhesitate to speak to a dedicated and highly skilled
are extremely poor.Atlanta personal injury lawyer.
Other points that go toward a judge and jury